Sexual identities misrepresent actual sexual needs of men

Sexual identities represented by the concept of 'sexual orientation' or the 'homo-hetero' divide represent only the acknowledged sexual behaviour of males. And men will acknowledge only those sexual behaviours that fall inside the society's purview of manhood, especially taking care to disown sexual behaviours or desires that are distinctly labelled as queer/ effeminate/ third gender, the experiences of 'gay' identitied males notwithstanding.

There are a number of extremely complex pscycho-social mechanisms that are part of a complex, yet invisible politics of male gender and sexuality, that create a wide gap between the deepest sexual desires and needs of males and the final sexual behaviour that is acknowledged socially, again, the experiences of 'gay' identified males (who're actually third gender males, not 'men', the latter being masculine gendered males), notwithstanding.

There are several gaps and steps between the deepest, orignal sexual needs of men and the final sexual behaviour they acknowledge socially, and there is intense, hidden but complex politics, manipulation and oppression of male gender and sexuality at each step. There are the "deepest sexual needs", many parts of which otten lie latent due to social conditioning, then the sexual needs which find space in the "subconscious mind", then there are those that are allowed space to grow in the "conscious mind", then tthere are those that are allowed the space to grow in the "personal' social space", and finally, there is the "socially acknowledged" sexual behaviour. Because of the presence of politics of male gender and sexuality, none of these steps may tally with each other. E.g. most men do not allow an important array of sexual needs that exist at the conscious level to find expression even in their private, personal social behaviour, let alone being acknowledged. Others may give them expression but not acknowledge them.

For Western science, to conveniently assume that the sexual categories defined by the West represent the deepest sexual needs of males, and to study these sexual identities for their biological connections is too simplistic, not to be a part of science's way to contribute to the age-old conspiracy against men.

The truth is that these sexual categories suit only the 'gay' identified males, whose deepest sexual thoughts tally with their chosen identities. And it is so for a reason. Because, these identities have been tailor made for them, Because their gender (femininity) tallies with the hidden gender baggage tied with the 'homosexual identity. But for the rest of the males, the actual 'men', they're a gross misrepresentation of their gender and sexuality. It's like groping the tail of the elephant and then defining the entire elephant as a rope.

What is so different about the 'gay' identified males that makes their case special. You will not understand the real difference unless you acknowledge human gender (masculine vs feminine identity) as a real, valid phenomenon. Unfortunately, western society makes it very difficult, if not impossible for people, esp. gays, to acknowledge human gender. Gays also have a personal stake in not recognizing gender, since their very identity depends on the negation of gender and its confusion with sexuality.

Gays are third genders, not men, if we define 'men' as masculine gendered males (not necessarily macho), and 'third genders' as transgendered males, which is how they've been defined in every part of the world and in every age, before the West manipulated these definitions. And the truth is that the sexual identities defined by the West have been rooted in politics of gender and sexuality, and their basis continues to be strongly gender rather than sexuality. Thus, the 'homosexual' identity is actually, the original and biological third gender/ transgendered male identity redefined as 'men who like men'. This gender factor is however hidden and westerners are incapable of seeing it due to their cultural disability. But, this is the only reason that some males fit in so nicely in this 'sexual categorization' with hidden gender baggages and others struggle or prefer to hide or suppress their sexual feelings for men, rather than take on the 'gay' identity. For the gay chauvinists, (for the men who are 'caught') they're just people incapable of dealing with their sexuality. But in reality, they are reacting to the hidden feminine gender attached with the 'homosexual' identity, that is inimical to their masculine gender, not withstanding the Western world's formal negation of human gender.

And this is the reason, why, for gays their deepest sexual desires matche their sexual identity, but for straights it often mismatches, in different degrees. To build the scientific theories of human male sexuality, especially of man's sexuality for men, on the basis of the experiences or the biology of 'gay' identified males is a gross abuse of the scientific process and the spirit of science.

Human gender plays such a strong part in the entire social-sexualization of men, and in their final choice of sexual behaviours and even conscious desires, that for science to attempt to understand the truth about human sexuality without acknowledging human gender is suicidal for the truth.

The problem is, this is what the Western scientific institution really wants. To muddle the truth. Because that is what the politics of male gender and sexuality has been since ages. But westerners will never accept that. Because, they worship the scientific institution like it were god. Like their ancestors worshipped the Church, and believed everything the church said about god. And then there are the anti-man vested interests, who don't want the truth to come out.